Skip to main content

CBD In Food & Beverage: Three Developments To Watch In 2020

Hand holding pipette with CBD oil on wooden table

While products containing CBD are widespread, new legal developments are expected in 2020 that may … [+] affect how the products are marketed and sold in certain jurisdictions.

Getty

The cannabidiol (CBD) industry saw considerable growth in 2019, and the industry is expected to see further expansion over the new year. In the absence of clear federal guidance, sellers of products containing CBD, particularly those in the food and beverage space, should watch how three developments might affect their products and the industry as a whole.

  • Further FDA Clarification: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced in November 2019 that the agency had numerous “unanswered questions and data gaps about CBD toxicity” and issued over a dozen warning letters to sellers of CBD-containing products. The FDA’s updated Consumer Update declared that marketing CBD “by adding it to a food or labeling it as a dietary supplement” is illegal. In its announcement, the FDA noted that it is continuing to explore “potential pathways for various types of CBD products to be lawfully marketed” and expects to provide an update on its “progress regarding the agency’s approach to these products in the coming weeks.” After the agency’s November announcement and warning letters, manufacturers of CBD products, particularly those in food and beverage categories, should watch how the FDA clarifies and enforces its position on CBD-containing products over the new year.
  • State and Local Action: Without clear federal guidelines, states have created a regulatory patchwork of often conflicting rules across the country. As one headline put it: “Headaches abound as states try to clarify [the] CBD landscape.” Some states, such as Maryland, have declared it illegal to add CBD to food products. Similarly, New York City regulators have embargoed food and drink products containing CBD. Media reports note that City officials have ordered at least five restaurants to stop selling CBD-containing food and drink products and that enforcement of the embargo includes fines ranging from $200 to $650. For 2020, the industry should watch how states continue to take action in the absence of clear federal guidance. For example, New York State recently passed a new law, effective in March 2020, that establishes a regulatory framework for the sale of CBD-containing products in the state.  State officials are expected to issue new regulations fleshing out the law in the coming weeks.
  • Class Action Litigation: Given the ambiguity around applicable rules surrounding CBD-containing products, particularly those in the food and beverage industry, private party litigation is expected to increase in the coming year. Already several federal class action lawsuits have been lodged against manufacturers of CBD products alleging that the products are “illegal to sell” and therefore violate state consumer protection laws.   While the CBD industry has expected an “avalanche” of class action cases for some time, the already-filed class action lawsuits suggest that the “CBD lawsuit floodgates are opening.”

Federal and state regulators are contemplating further action over the coming year. So too are additional private party plaintiffs, who are poised to present putative class action allegations given the “language of the FDA’s recent pronouncements and the widespread availability of CBD-containing products.” Manufacturers of CBD-containing products, particularly those in the food and beverage space, should be aware of these developments over the coming year.

Original Article Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommytobin/2020/12/31/cbd-in-food--beverage-three-developments-to-watch-in-2020/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New York City Adds More Exceptions To Pre-Employment Marijuana Testing Ban

An ambitious campaign to decriminalize psychedelics in Washington, D.C., is one step closer to placing their measure on the November ballot with the formal submission of tens of thousands of voter signatures. Organizers have been scrambling for weeks to collect enough signatures from D.C. voters by Monday’s deadline amid historically difficult circumstances: a global pandemic, months of stay-at-home orders and protests over racism and police violence that filled the streets of the nation’s capital. But with the help of innovative signature-gathering techniques and allies flown in from across the country, advocates said they had successfully submitted upwards of 35,000 signatures—more than enough to qualify the initiative. If approved by voters, Initiative 81 would make enforcement of laws against plant- and fungus-based psychedelics among the “lowest law enforcement priorities” for the Metropolitan Police Department. It would not, however, legalize or reduce penalties for the subs

Charlotte Figi The Girl Who Inspired A CBD Movement Has Died At Age 13

Charlotte had recently been hospitalized due to pneumonia, breathing problems and seizures. She was treated as a likely case of Covid-19, her mother, Paige Figi, said Wednesday, although she tested negative for the virus. “Charlotte is no longer suffering. She is seizure-free forever,” a family friend wrote on Paige Figi’s Facebook page, announcing Charlotte’s death. “Thank you so much for all of your love.” Charlotte became a symbol of the possibilities of CBD after CNN Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta told her story in the documentary “Weed.” In the film, Charlotte was shown to be a playful child who was overcome by horrific seizures, which were quelled with Charlotte’s Web, a marijuana strain named in her honor. Charlotte had Dravet syndrome, a rare form of epilepsy which was not controlled by medication. The Stanley brothers, marijuana growers in Colorado, were crossbreeding a strain of marijuana high in CBD and low in THC, its psychoactive ingredient. After Charlo

Virginia CBD Program Criticized As Multistate Medical Cannabis Operators Gain Edge

Seven companies are challenging a CBD licensing process in Virginia that resulted in multistate medical marijuana operators getting a majority of available licenses. The appeals called the process “wildly prejudicial.” Out of 51 applicants for five vertically integrated CBD and THC-A licenses, multistate operators received three, a situation that spurred the appeals, The Virginian-Pilot reported. Applicants filing the appeals complained the closed-meeting review process lacked fairness and transparency. One consultant to an applicant said the selections felt “predetermined.” The Virginia Board of Pharmacy reportedly sent information to the applicants in December explaining its selections, but some applicants weren’t satisfied. A board spokeswoman wrote in an email to the Pilot that the board “does not comment on pending litigation.” The five winning applicants , called “pharmaceutical processors,” have a year from winning the licenses to become operational. The multistate